Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Annotated Bibliography

Melvin Fuentes
Ms. Grandchamp
English 12
11 April 2012
The Effects the Social Media has on students
Fodeman, Doug, and Marje Monroe. "The Impact of Facebook on Our Students." National Association of Independent Schools. National Association of Independent Schools, 10 Feb. 2009. Web. 25 Jan. 2012. <http://www.nais.org/resources/article.cfm?ItemNumber=151505>.  The article cites Doug Fodeman & Marje Monroe saying that "children and teens today growing up in a world where they are wired 24/7 without a break" thus affecting the dedication to their studies. This article also shows how you could lose your privacy when using Facebook and other media sites "they don't realize that the instant they post something to Facebook (or MySpace or YouTube, etc.), they've just lost control and ownership of that content ", this shows the dangers of sharing all your ideas in the internet. This article also suggest that Facebook and other sites like it could be a home for cyber bullying "Every day online there are thousands of kids who say mean and hurtful things because they can". These authors are credible sources because the have several other articles about regarding the social media today. This is useful because it shows me the negative effects that the social media has on students.
Stout, Hilary. "Antisocial Networking." NY Times. NY Times, 30 Apr. 2010. Web. 05 Feb. 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/02/fashion/02BEST.html?pagewanted=all>. The article by Hilary Stout said that many kids between the ages of 8-18 years old use a type of electronic device more than 7 hours in a day. The article also states that 50% of American teens send about 50 text messages a day. It also as some feels uncomfortable when they don’t have their phones next to them. Social Networks like Facebook are effecting the way teens communicate. These sites are can cause harmful things like cyber bullying and damage a teens self esteem. The internet may cause bad things like cyber bullying but others suggest “technology is bringing children closer than ever”. This is credible because this is from a very known publisher (NY Times)  and author who has many other articles. I will use most of this article because it was very informative on how it effects teens social statues. It also talks about cyber bullying and how it effects teens.
Derbyshire, David. "Social Websites Harm Children's Brains: Chilling Warning to Parents from Top Neuroscientist." Mail Online. 24 Feb. 2009. Web. 12 Feb. 2012. <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1153583/Social-websites-harm-childrens-brains-Chilling-warning-parents-neuroscientist.html>. The article talks about how social websites make kids and teens have a shorter attention span and makes them self centered. Some psychologist and neurologist suggest that the social network is doing more harm than good. Although the article shows the negative it also says "Psychologists have also argued that digital technology is changing the way we think. They point out that students no longer need to plan essays before starting to write - thanks to word processors they can edit as they go along". This also states how Sue Palmer said 'We are seeing children's brain development damaged because they don't engage in the activity they have engaged in for millennia". This author seems credible because it shows where he is getting his source from and he has also written a lot more good articles about related sources.  I plan to use this article on how social media effect us by shortening our attention span.
Nauert, Rick. "Social Medias Impact on Kids A Mixed." Psych Central.com. 08 Aug. 2011. Web. 02 Feb. 2012. <http://psychcentral.com/news/2011/08/08/social-medias-impact-on-kids-a-mixed-bag/28425.html>.   The article shows the benefits and the risk of using the social media. Some negative effects are “young adults who have a strong Facebook presence show more signs of other psychological disorders, including antisocial behaviors, mania and aggressive tendencies”. Some other negative effects are when they suggest that “Studies found that middle school, high school and college students who checked Facebook at least once during a 15-minute study period got lower grades”. Although these are big negative effects it also showed some positive effects like “Social networking can provide tools for teaching in compelling ways that engage young students”. This article also states that learning how to work with a computer in Facebook may give you the ability to do the same thing in a smart phone and a tablet.  This article also tells that social networking can also provide tools for teaching in compelling ways that engage young students. This article very credible because of the fact that there has been research done by these psychologist who specialize in these kind of problems.  I will use the negative effects to support how it effects teens and young adults but I don’t think I will show the positive effect because it seems like a weak source to use.
"Social Networking's Good and Bad Impacts On Kids." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 06 Aug. 2011. Web. 12 Feb. 2012. <http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/08 /110806203538.htm>.  This article shows the positive effects show by the social media like "Young adults who spend more time on Facebook are better at showing "virtual empathy" to their online friends". Although its shows good positive effects it also shows the bad like "strong Facebook presence show more signs of other psychological disorders". It talks about how helps us learn to socialize with a smart phone or a laptop which could be a useful. But I like how they show some of the other effects like "negative effect on the health of all children, preteens and teenagers by making them more prone to anxiety, depression". It states how the social media has help teens communicate around the world and how its useful for knowledge.
Mezrich, Ben. The Accidental Billionaires: The Founding of Facebook. New York: Doubleday, 2009. Print. This book describes the history behind Facebook and how it was created by a young genius named Mark Zuckerberg. During the time Eduardo Saverin was a senior and team up with Zuckerberg to create a social media website that eventually became the most visited website in the world. This book shows the struggles and accomplishments they went through not to mention the big problem between them at the end. This is reliable source because the author Ben Mezrich, is the author of eleven books including one that spend sixty-three weeks in New Yorks Times best seller. I would cite this source in my paper to show the history of one of the biggest social medias in the world.
Andrews, Lori B. I Know Who You Are and I Saw What You Did: Social Networks and the Death of Privacy. New York: Free, 2012. Print. This book describes how the social media has improved our communications but it has also taken away our privacy. Lori Andrews says that the way social medias like Facebook make profit is by advertising and by getting to know our interest for companies we buy thing from. A picture you posted online can be used to deny you a service or jobs. This is a reliable source because the author is Lori Andrews, a law professor at the Illinois Institute of  Technology in Chicago which shows her reliability. I will use this to show how the social media is taking away some of your privacy.
Sethi, Gobind S. "How Social Media Effects Students." Personal interview. 07 Mar. 2012. During this interview, Gobind Sethi, a full time student that attends Granada Hills Charter High School, informed me how he has trouble focusing sometimes when he is doing a research paper or studying for a big exam. I asked why did he have trouble and he responded by saying that when he is typing his report or if the computer is in front of him while doing his assignment, he goes on websites like Facebook and Youtube and sometimes spends a lot of time that could be used to finish his work, this he says may contribute to most of his failed assignments. He told that he is not the only one that has this problem and he knows plenty of people that do this as well. This is a credible source because he is a trustworthy person as I have been told by many teachers in our school. I will use this to show how a lot of people have trouble focusing while Facebook and Youtube are within their reach.

Wednesday, February 15, 2012


“Specific Page Title or Article Title”
 Ex: “Twilight: A negative influence on teens or just harmless fun?”
Social Networking's Good and Bad Impacts On Kids
Primary Contributor to the Website (if given) (author, editor, producer, etc)
Ex: POV
Unknown
Title of the Entire Website (not www. )
 Ex: CBC News
ScienceDaily
Publisher or Sponsoring Organization of the website (if given)
Ex: CBC
Date Page was Last Revised
Ex: 10 September 2010
06 August 2011
Date You Read It
Ex: 21 January 2012
12 February 2012
<URL address> (ALL of it)
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/08
/110806203538.htm 





FIVE FACTS FROM THE SOURCE (Embedded):
EX: The article cites Maria Nikolajeva, a professor of at Cambridge, as saying that Bella does not "in any way promote independent thinking or personal development" in women, instead portraying a woman "meek and willing to do anything for her vampire boyfriend" (POV).
This article shows the positive effects show by the social media like "Young adults who spend more time on Facebook are better at showing "virtual empathy" to their online friends".
Although its shows good positive effects it also shows the bad like "strong Facebook presence show more signs of other psychological disorders".
It talks about how helps us learn to socialize with a smart phone or a laptop which could be a useful.
But I like how they show some of the other effects like "negative effect on the health of all children, preteens and teenagers by making them more prone to anxiety, depression".
It states how the social media has help teens communicate around the world and how its useful for knowledge.




Summary of Source (Three-Four Sentences of the Who, What, Where, Why, and How in your own words. NO OPINION): 


EX: POV brings together information from a Cambridge conference in which professors of literature examine Twilight's effect on teenagers. Many of the sources cited talk about the negative affect on women that the books have had.  The writer then turns around and asks the reader to take a poll, which is noted as not being scientific, to see what the general populance thinks on this issue. 
The article list some bad and good reasons on why the social media is bad and what we can do to help ourselves or teens.


Credibility of Source: 
Author or Site: Who is the author? What training have they had? If there is no author, examine the site. What is the purpose of the site? Who funds the site? 


EX for Author: POV is simply a penname for an anonymous author. It stands for Point of View, and the majority of the articles written on the news cite are simply there to ask the opinion of the reader, and rehash someone else's research. 
 The author is anonymous and i think this looses some of the articles credibility. 
EX for Site: CBC News is one of the main news associations in Canada, and the purpose seems to be to bring the news to the people. The articles are meant to inspire discussion, not so much force an opinion. 
The website I think just shows the studies people have made and put them into one article.


Attachment: Does the author or site have anything to gain from writing this, or is it simply informative? For example, is it a cigarette business posting an article about the benefit of cigarettes, or is it a scientific community unaffiliated with the cigarette business? 


EX: Other than keeping a job with the Canadian News, it seems the variety of articles displays a lack of attachment. 
I think they dont have anything to gain because they show they have researched their work. 
Bias: Do you detect a bias (a favoring of either side) in the author's writing? 


EX: There is a slight bias in the fact that only the negative effects of Twilight are mentioned, not the positive. 
I dont really detect any bias because they state the good and bad things our Facebook.
References: Does the author cite references in the writing? If so, do these add or take away from the credibility? 

EX: The author uses Cambridge professors in his/her argument, making it stronger, as they are professors of literature. 

I would take away some credibility from the article because it does not state an author.
Use of Source: How will you use this source in your project? 


EX: I plan to use this source to support my opinion that Twilight has a negative effect on teenagers, and also use it as a jumping off point for other sources, as it has a link to an MSNBC article about this issue.


I am going to use these examples on how Facebook and other social medias can help and hurt the teenagers.
“Specific Page Title or Article Title”
 Ex: “Twilight: A negative influence on teens or just harmless fun?”
Social websites harm children's brains: Chilling warning to parents from top neuroscientist
Primary Contributor to the Website (if given) (author, editor, producer, etc)
Ex: POV
David Derbyshire
Title of the Entire Website (not www. )
 Ex: CBC News
Mail online
Publisher or Sponsoring Organization of the website (if given)
Ex: CBC
Date Page was Last Revised
Ex: 10 September 2010
24 February 2009
Date You Read It
Ex: 21 January 2012
12 February 2012
<URL address> (ALL of it)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1153583/Social-websites-harm-childrens-brains-Chilling-warning-parents-neuroscientist.html 


FIVE FACTS FROM THE SOURCE (Embedded):
EX: The article cites Maria Nikolajeva, a professor of at Cambridge, as saying that Bella does not "in any way promote independent thinking or personal development" in women, instead portraying a woman "meek and willing to do anything for her vampire boyfriend" (POV).
The article talks about how social websites make kids and teens have a shorter attention span and makes them self centered.
Some psychologist and neurologist suggest that the social network is doing more harm than good.
The article also states "Lady Greenfield told the Lords a teacher of 30 years had told her she had noticed a sharp decline in the ability of her pupils to understand others".
Although the article shows the negative it also says "Psychologists have also argued that digital technology is changing the way we think. They point out that students no longer need to plan essays before starting to write - thanks to word processors they can edit as they go along".
This also states how Sue Palmer said 'We are seeing children's brain development damaged because they don't engage in the activity they have engaged in for millennia".


Summary of Source (Three-Four Sentences of the Who, What, Where, Why, and How in your own words. NO OPINION): 

EX: POV brings together information from a Cambridge conference in which professors of literature examine Twilight's effect on teenagers. Many of the sources cited talk about the negative affect on women that the books have had.  The writer then turns around and asks the reader to take a poll, which is noted as not being scientific, to see what the general populance thinks on this issue. 

The article shows that the social media is shortening the attention span of kids and teens. This has been tested by many psychologist and neurologist. 

Credibility of Source: 
Author or Site: Who is the author? What training have they had? If there is no author, examine the site. What is the purpose of the site? Who funds the site? 

EX for Author: POV is simply a penname for an anonymous author. It stands for Point of View, and the majority of the articles written on the news cite are simply there to ask the opinion of the reader, and rehash someone else's research. 
I think the author is stating his opinion and evidence that shows why the social media is bad. 

EX for Site: CBC News is one of the main news associations in Canada, and the purpose seems to be to bring the news to the people. The articles are meant to inspire discussion, not so much force an opinion. 
This website seems trustworthy because the author shows where he gets all his sources and what the people said.

Attachment: Does the author or site have anything to gain from writing this, or is it simply informative? For example, is it a cigarette business posting an article about the benefit of cigarettes, or is it a scientific community unaffiliated with the cigarette business? 

EX: Other than keeping a job with the Canadian News, it seems the variety of articles displays a lack of attachment. 
I doubt the website has anything to gain from this article.

Bias: Do you detect a bias (a favoring of either side) in the author's writing? 

EX: There is a slight bias in the fact that only the negative effects of Twilight are mentioned, not the positive. 
There is a slight bias in the fact that it only states one negative comment.

References: Does the author cite references in the writing? If so, do these add or take away from the credibility? 

EX: The author uses Cambridge professors in his/her argument, making it stronger, as they are professors of literature. 
The author does site his sources, thus his credibility for me goes up.

Use of Source: How will you use this source in your project? 

EX: I plan to use this source to support my opinion that Twilight has a negative effect on teenagers, and also use it as a jumping off point for other sources, as it has a link to an MSNBC article about this issue.

I plan to use these article on how social media effect us by shortening our attention span.